<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ThunkTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thunk.tv/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thunk.tv</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:33:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Cicadas Dance by Nikon Camera Reviews</title>
		<link>http://thunk.tv/what-do-nashville-cicadas-love-more-than-anything/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Camera Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunk.tv/?p=435#comment-85</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s really interesting.  Thanks for posting all the great information!  Had never thought of it all that way before.   
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bestdigitalcamerasreview.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Best Digital Cameras&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really interesting.  Thanks for posting all the great information!  Had never thought of it all that way before.<br />
<a href="http://www.bestdigitalcamerasreview.net" rel="nofollow">Best Digital Cameras</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Language Lab: Counterexceptionym by Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://thunk.tv/test-post/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunk.tv/?p=4#comment-12</guid>
		<description>And in the phrase &quot;you know what they say,&quot; wouldn&#039;t &quot;they&quot; be a counterexceptionym?
After all, who are &quot;they&quot;? Unless I make it clear who &quot;they&quot; refers to, we only know that &quot;they&quot; isn&#039;t &quot;you&quot; and isn&#039;t &quot;me,&quot; which is a pretty small subgroup, unless there are a lot of you out there. There&#039;s only one me--that I&#039;m aware of. In fact, unless I know who &quot;you&quot; are, all I can mean by it is &quot;not me.&quot; So in such a case, isn&#039;t &quot;you&quot; a counterexceptionym?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in the phrase &#8220;you know what they say,&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;they&#8221; be a counterexceptionym?<br />
After all, who are &#8220;they&#8221;? Unless I make it clear who &#8220;they&#8221; refers to, we only know that &#8220;they&#8221; isn&#8217;t &#8220;you&#8221; and isn&#8217;t &#8220;me,&#8221; which is a pretty small subgroup, unless there are a lot of you out there. There&#8217;s only one me&#8211;that I&#8217;m aware of. In fact, unless I know who &#8220;you&#8221; are, all I can mean by it is &#8220;not me.&#8221; So in such a case, isn&#8217;t &#8220;you&#8221; a counterexceptionym?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Language Lab: Counterexceptionym by Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://thunk.tv/test-post/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunk.tv/?p=4#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Ah, so &quot;Earthling&quot; is an omnipluridrome, but &quot;alien&quot; is, in fact, a counterexceptionym.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, so &#8220;Earthling&#8221; is an omnipluridrome, but &#8220;alien&#8221; is, in fact, a counterexceptionym.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Living With Feet (Vintage Educational Film) by mike parker</title>
		<link>http://thunk.tv/test-post-3/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>mike parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunk.tv/?p=10#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Wow. Who knew? Guess all those Baptists were right all those years. Dancing really is sinful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Who knew? Guess all those Baptists were right all those years. Dancing really is sinful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Language Lab: Counterexceptionym by Language Lab: Omnipluridrome</title>
		<link>http://thunk.tv/test-post/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Language Lab: Omnipluridrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thunk.tv/?p=4#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] n. Any word that is not a counterexceptionym. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] n. Any word that is not a counterexceptionym. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Language Lab: Omnipluridrome by Word of the Week: Counterexceptionym</title>
		<link>http://thunk.tv/hello-world/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Word of the Week: Counterexceptionym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] See: omnipluridrome. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See: omnipluridrome. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
